The United States is in deprives elsewhere

Since 2002, crises are cycled through: April 21, the "no" to the referendum, the crisis of the suburbs, the CPE, Clearstream case. Have a common point

They all express a form of revolt, the feeling that politicians assume more responsibilities, that they are powerless to give opportunities. It is extremely dangerous. When there is more that desire for the future, the economic depression machine installs.

How to restore confidence

Starting with the collective intelligence of the citizens and territories trust! And by not inflicting not the spectacle of an end of reign which demoralizes, lowers the image of the France and hurt its economy. Individual French optimism is accompanied by a strong collective pessimism: they doubt the capacity and the talent of their country.

These crises do not reflect difficulty accepting a world that changes increasingly faster

Accept is not to suffer. Each industrial revolution ended, not without struggle, by lead to his social consideration. Coal and steam engine brought the first social laws and the recognition of trade unions. Electricity and the automobile led to an overall social protection system and the improvement of the purchasing power of employees. We are now in the third, one of the technologies of information and communication on bottom of accelerated globalization: the old fordian compromise is dead but no "good deal", no "new deal", not yet replaced him. Hence this pest imbalance between capital and labour. As long as we have not succeeded in implementing new security systems adapted to the changes in our world, the fear and distrust prevail. The discourse on the PBS was more poorly felt that it was worn by those who do not know the precarious. We must stop giving lessons on does not apply to yourself or you would not for her children. Otherwise the gap between rulers and ruled is widening.

Prepare a "good deal", to agree on the diagnosis. The left has trouble with liberalism... How about you

Liberalism is what Maurice Allais, Nobel economics prize, called in raw terms "chienlit let-fairiste", I did not want to in. There may be in open competition factors of progress if it is corrected strongly in its perverse effects and regulated to be put at the service of progress. It is the mission of the left.

What forms must take new security you are talking about

It must combine two forms of efficiency: economic and social. Companies have even more need for agility and responsiveness that they are directly exposed to international competition. Employees, they need that the transition from one job to another is properly secure financially, with appropriate training and personalized support. Why the Scandinavian employees live without drama their mobility Because they have confidence in the effectiveness of their public employment service. That obsession with dismantling the right to work, this is the new type which we could inspire us.

Can the discussion focus on the contract of employment

A condition: the Commission must remain the basis, as a society jeopardizing in its fundamental principles goes adrift. The Commission, it is the right fundamental for any human being a wage security and the dignity of a job. It must be the backbone, and is the social dialogue need to define what must be relaxed, taking into account a balanced the needs of companies, especially those who innovate and take risks, and the dignity of employees, are not a disposable adjustment variable.

Should we encourage these firms through fiscal measures

The first to take on a mass basis, it is a very incentive tax status for investments in research and innovation. And in the environment, now all eco-industries.

When Peugeot has recently announced the closure of a plant of 2,300 employees in Britain, Tony Blair absolutely nothing was said...

This lack of response is fear. Political speech must be used: it may be deterrent and preventive. Companies have a responsibility for the territories.

Must the State defend a company when it is threatened

Yes. The United States is in deprives elsewhere. We should be honest and do not prohibit what our businesses to allow foreign. An OPA can be positive if correspond to synergy and a coherent industrial project.

What do you think of the "economic patriotism"

It is the hijacking of a word which means to love and serve his country. The Government, which alarm hardly the massive presence of Anglo-Saxon funds in the capital of French companies, is a linguistic gadget that covers the privatisation of gas of France and turns its back on the necessary constitution of European champions.

I need to oppose the outsourcing

Should never be resignation.

Do you agree with the attitude of the MP UDF Jean Lassalle, who made a hunger strike to prevent a relocation within 100 kilometres of its common

Non. It is an abuse of parliamentary action and more baroque, it is Ministers is yield, even if I do not question the sincerity of Jean Lassalle.

How to combat the gloomy

It must reconcile the French with the company, put an end to the bigotry of social relations. Companies that headline items are those whose patterns are outrageous. And then there is an unfortunate confusion between the financialisation of the economy and business. When talking to the French pension funds, masses of volatile money move for the maximum benefit in a way completely disconnected from the real value of the company, it is the image of all businesses that suffers.

Do you think that business leaders are too paid

There is excess, go-ahead. The French are shocked when they learn the amount of stock options, severance benefits and pensions hats of some leaders. They discover that a certain altitude, the failed pay, whereas they can, they lose their jobs without a fault.

Are the 35-hour for something in the devaluation of labour

Those who say this are mistaken diagnosis. It is not free in time

who converts work, but rather a discomfort to work which leads to invest elsewhere. See the motivation of managers. It is linked to the instability in pressure. The right policy has been profoundly destructive value work because it has built in standard poverty for many.

Must be flexible yet 35 hours to restore purchasing power

Of flexibilities have already been made. May be beyond so that those who want to work can do so, but I find outrageous the blackmail in the employment to which companies engage to challenge of the TCTS agreements. The true subject would be able to adjust working time according to the stages of life. I do not think the rigid answers once and for all but the negotiated developments.

This "deal", who must pass it

The social partners, with the help of the State, guarantor of the general interest. This implies a greater representativeness of Trade Union and employer organizations. Need to create France a mass unionism, why not by a compulsory accession to the Union of his choice. But could also, according to subjects, expand the number of interlocutors.

You want to pass over the intermediate body

No, because they are essential. But it must be able to associate the citizens with the major choices affecting them. I do so in Poitou-Charentes in participatory forums on the major problems of the region.

Unions are not very hot.

They are suspicious of the consensus at any price, that is often at low prices. Me too. If I want to trade unionism to mass develops, it is precisely to rebalance forces report today very unfavourable to employees. But part of the antagonism traditional between capital and labour, I believe that it is possible to substitute a new dynamic equilibrium economic performance and social justice. I am sure that there is an enlightened employers ready to accept it.

Laurence Parisot part of this enlightened employers

I do not think that the Medef and CGPME have this reputation! I see a lot of entrepreneurs who do not recognize. They do not of ideology, they fight and realized that happy employees are productive.

Is there a problem of cost of the work

Yes, but not by wages, because of the charges. Should transfer the disease and family tax contributions. Because the coverage of these risks is of national solidarity.

Does increase the minimum wage

I don't want to fall into the ease of "tomorrow, shaving gratis", but the France of the "mille euristes" hard ends. And with the increase of charges it is has more poor workers and families overindebted. So yes, it should be.

You said recently: "No person shall be paid to do nothing."

It is a way that the work is the first factor of social integration, and be private, it is also losing a fundamental sense of belonging and, sometimes, to self-esteem. Those which lie at the bottom of wages often have the feeling that it is not fair that other related with income assistance; This feeds the rejection of the other and the spectre of decommissioning. Do not ignore this issue by naïve optimism. It is excluded from review our solidarity downward or resign himself to the growing number of working poor, but it must be said clearly in consideration of any resource, there is a work or a useful training, which is also provided in the texts.

In your area, you tie the grant of public aid for various criteria such as the quality of employment. Is this logic transposed at national level

When I manage the taxes paid by citizens, I have the concern not to waste. Therefore it is a logic of the winner for the company-winner for the region. I note that after a period of surprise enterprises play the game. At the national level, it is perfectly transposable, it is part of good governance.

Are other economies possible, given the weight of the debt

Yes. The left should give objective of reducing the deficits. A growth-friendly policy help, but the State must reduce its train of life, its waste and its duplicate relying on true decentralization. A strong State which organises the redistribution is perfectly compatible with decentralization that will end.

The "royalisme" for the moment it is more a method than specific proposals.

The "royalisme", frankly, is not a slogan that I claimed. I prefer to speak of "ségolisme". But each thing in its time. We are currently finalizing the project of the Socialists and I do not see why I should now raise my own catalogue. The method, it is essential. See the counterexample of the SCE. I believe in the need for a diagnosis shared with the French: it merit of time deciding and move to the Act. He must then assess lucidly, correct as needed, admitting that a political decision interacts with the social body and that adjustments are needed. Stiffness, it is the best way to do nothing change.

Your values: work, family, homeland...

(Laughs). The association of these three words is shocking and sinister memory! But upgrading work, defend families in all their diversity, nuclear, stepfamily, single parents, LGBT, and what makes us keep standing in a same nation, Yes, it is important. More justice and solidarity, all stands.

Is the "just order" that you defend not a theme of right

Absolutely not. Right, it is authoritarianism, injustice and lawlessness resulting. I support my opinion, an order which is justice and an authority based on shareable values. Respected rules are respectable rules: those which impose to all and not just to some while others move in.

Just order, sustainable security, Nicolas Sarkozy used the same terms.

Not really! In the cities where the despair and anger accumulate, in the world of work where there is fear of being landed from one day to the next day, on the whole of society where the social "descenseur" seems inexorably in walking at the head of State: everywhere the right sows injustice and creates disorder.